It Seems Incontrovertible To Me That There

The Second Thing Is, If You Want To Do Something About Global Warming, You Have To Think Much More Long-term. There Is Something Wrong With Saying We Should Start Using Renewables Now, While They Are Still Incredibly Expensive.

The Total Efforts Of The Last 20 Years Of Climate Policy Has Likely Reduced Global Emissions By Less Than 1 Percent, Or About 250 Million Metric Tons Of Carbon Dioxide Per Year.

I Really Try To Say Things As They Basically Are And It So Happens That It Is A Good Message That Things Are Getting Better, But There Are Still Problems.

In The Rich World, The Environmental Situation Has Improved Dramatically. In The United States, The Most Important Environmental Indicator, Particulate Air Pollution, Has Been Cut By More Than Half Since 1955, Rivers And Coastal Waters Have Dramatically Improved, And Forests Are Increasing.

There Is No Question That Global Warming Will Have A Significant Impact On Already Existing Problems Such As Malaria, Malnutrition, And Water Shortages. But This Doesn't Mean The Best Way To Solve Them Is To Cut Carbon Emissions.